Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 15336

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : October | Volume : 17 | Issue : 10 | Page : QC01 - QC05 Full Version

Management of Dermoid Cysts in Pregnancy at a Tertiary Care Centre: A Retrospective Observational Study


Published: October 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/63746.18535
Tamma Anusha Reddy, SL Arathy RaJ, Minakshi Kumari, Swati Rathore, K Beena

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India. 4. Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India. 5. Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
K Beena,
7th Floor, OG1 Office, ISSC Building, CMCH, Vellore-632002, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: beenaruthk@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Ovarian masses are not uncommon in pregnancy. The increased use of Ultrasonography (USG) in recent years has led to the detection of asymptomatic ovarian masses in pregnant women. Dermoid cysts are the most common type of ovarian germ cell tumour in pregnancy. Most of them are asymptomatic and are incidental findings. However, a few can present with complications such as torsion and rupture. The diagnosis and management of dermoid cysts in pregnancy present a clinical dilemma.

Aim: To evaluate the management and outcomes of antenatal patients diagnosed with dermoid cysts.

Materials and Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India, from January 2015 to January 2022. The study included 37 patients, and data regarding the diagnosis of dermoid cysts, their radiological and clinical characteristics, management, and pregnancy outcomes were collected from the electronic database. Descriptive statistics were used for reporting demographic and clinical characteristics. Categorical variables were presented as numbers with percentages, while continuous variables were presented as mean with Standard Deviation (SD) or median with Interquartile Range (IQR).

Results: The dermoid cysts ranged in size from 2.2 cm to 30 cm, with a mean size of 7.28±4.51 cm. A total of 35 (95%) of them were incidentally detected. USG was the imaging modality used for diagnosis and follow-up. Only 30% (11/37) of the patients required surgical intervention during the antenatal period. Torsion was the indication for emergency surgical intervention in 46% (5/11) of cases. Laparoscopy was the preferred approach for surgical intervention in 91% (10/11) of patients. The remaining 70% (26/37) of patients were managed conservatively with serial USG, and no adverse outcomes were reported. Among the patients who underwent caesarean section for obstetric indications, 35% (13/37) also underwent surgical intervention for the dermoid cyst (either cystectomy or oophorectomy) during the same procedure.

Conclusion: Antenatal patients diagnosed with dermoid cysts during pregnancy can be managed conservatively with serial USG, with a plan for surgical intervention if needed. In cases where surgical intervention is required, it can be safely performed as a laparoscopic procedure. In case of complications such as torsion, laparoscopy can be performed during pregnancy with appropriate precautionary measures.

Keywords

Laparoscopic surgery, Mature cystic teratoma, Ovarian dermoid cyst, Ultrasound

The incidence of adnexal masses during pregnancy is estimated to be 1.5%-3%, of which only 5% are malignant (1). Dermoid cysts account for 10%-25% of these masses and occur bilaterally in 10%-15% of cases (2). Dermoid cysts are the most common non-functional benign ovarian tumours in premenopausal women, representing 70% of premenopausal women with an adnexal mass (3). The majority of adnexal masses in pregnancy are diagnosed incidentally during ultrasound examinations conducted as part of routine pregnancy evaluation (4).

However, the management of dermoid cysts during pregnancy can be challenging. The choice of diagnostic tests, such as imaging modalities and tumour markers, and their interpretation and usefulness are varied due to physiological changes in pregnancy. The management of incidentally detected dermoid cysts during pregnancy poses a dilemma in clinical practice. The decision between immediate surgical intervention and conservative management is challenging for both clinicians and patients (5). Surgical intervention performed in early gestations carries a risk of abortion (6). On the contrary, keeping patients on conservative management carries inherent risk of torsion, haemorrhage, or cyst rupture, potentially necessitating unplanned and emergency surgery later in advanced gestational ages. This can be quite detrimental to the mother and the foetus (1). Most of literature suggests that a patient can be kept of conservative management if the adnexal mass is ≤5 cm (7),(8),(9). However, for larger dimensions, there is an in diagnosis of dermoid ovarian cyst in the record during their antenatal period were creased risk of torsion and a higher likelihood of surgical intervention. Therefore, the present study was designed to evaluate the management approaches and outcomes of pregnant patients diagnosed with dermoid cysts.

Material and Methods

This retrospective observational study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India, from January 2015 to January 2022. Institutional review board clearance (IRB Min number 14950 dated 26.10.2022) was obtained. Collection of data was done from the electronic database and analysed for the specified study duration. The data collection and analysis were conducted from October 2022 to December 2022.

Inclusion criteria: All patients with a documented diagnosis of dermoid ovarian cyst during their antenatal period were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Since the present study was an observational study, no patients were excluded.

Study Procedure

Information pertaining to the gestational age at the diagnosis of the dermoid cyst, its size, various USG characteristics, subsequent follow-up, pregnancy outcomes, the need for surgical intervention, intraoperative findings, and final histopathological reports for surgically excised cysts were noted and analysed.

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to report demographic and clinical characteristics. Categorical variables were presented as numbers with percentages, while continuous variables were presented as means with SD and medians with IQR. All statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25.0.

Results

During the study period, a total of 37 patients were diagnosed with dermoid cysts during the antenatal period. The mean age of the patients was 26 years (±3.7 SD). Incidental detection accounted for 35 (95%) of the cases. The majority of the cysts were diagnosed during the first trimester scan (28 patients, 76%). The size of the dermoid cysts ranged from 2.2 cm to 30 cm, with a mean size of 7.28±4.51 cm. Two patients were found to have bilateral dermoid cysts (Table/Fig 1).

Out of the 37 patients, a total of 26 were managed conservatively and did not require antenatal surgery for the dermoid cyst. Among them, 13 patients underwent surgery for the dermoid cyst during Low Segment Caesarean Section (LSCS), five patients underwent planned elective surgery for the cyst after vaginal delivery, six patients were scheduled for elective surgery but it had not been performed at the time of the study, and two patients were lost to follow-up. One patient presented with mass perception and had a large 30 cm cyst. The Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) findings of this patient are shown in (Table/Fig 2).

Ultrasound was the chosen imaging modality for diagnosis and follow-up in all patients except one who had suspicious findings on the scan, leading to the use of a higher imaging modality, MRI, for better characterisation of the cyst. Tumour markers were not routinely performed for all patients. Only five patients had tumour markers {mainly Cancer Antigen-125 (CA-125) and Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA)} tested, and the results were within the normal range. This was due to one patient having a large cyst with suspicious features on USG and another patient having tumour markers obtained from a previous evaluation. The three remaining patients who had tumour markers tested had cyst sizes ≥10 cm. A significant proportion of patients (26/37, 70%) were managed conservatively with serial ultrasound examinations throughout the antenatal period. The plan was to perform either cystectomy or oophorectomy along with LSCS if needed for obstetric indications. There was no increase in the size of the cysts among those managed conservatively.

Only 11 out of 37 patients (30%) underwent surgical intervention for the dermoid cyst during the antenatal period. The most common indication for surgery was torsion, accounting for 5 out of 11 cases (46%). One patient required laparotomy and oophorectomy for a suspicious-looking, large (30 cm) cyst. Among the remaining cases, 10 out of 11 (91%) underwent laparoscopic surgery. The planned laparoscopic surgeries were performed between 12 to 21 weeks of gestation.

Out of the 26 patients who were managed conservatively and did not undergo antenatal surgical intervention or deliver vaginally, 13 of them underwent either cystectomy or oophorectomy as a concomitant procedure during LSCS performed for obstetric indications. Four patients out of the 26 who did not undergo antenatal surgical intervention or deliver vaginally underwent planned laparoscopic surgery for the dermoid cyst at a later date. Staging laparotomy was performed for one patient after LSCS due to a suspicious-looking cyst, and the histopathological report revealed a dermoid cyst on one side and a mucinous cyst on the other side. The surgical management of the study population is represented as a flowchart shown in (Table/Fig 3).

All surgical histopathology reports confirmed the presence of mature cystic teratoma. One of the reports indicated the additional component of mucinous cystadenoma within the mature cystic teratoma, while another patient had a mucinous cystadenoma in one ovary and a mature cystic teratoma in the other. The pregnancy outcomes were favourable for all patients, except for two who experienced foetal expulsion two days after emergency laparoscopic surgery for ovarian torsion in the second trimester. One patient included in the study was lost to follow-up.

Discussion

Dermoid cyst is the most common ovarian tumor in pregnancy (1) with 65%-85% being asymptomatic, as in the present study- where 95% were incidentally detected. In the rare instance of being symptomatic - they generally have non specific complaints (such as vague, non severe abdominal pain). In case of a large cyst there can be a palpable adnexal mass on clinical examination in early gestation.

Rarely these patients can present with a cute abdomen pain due to either torsion or rupture of cyst or haemorrhage into the cyst. The occurrence of torsion in pregnancy has a varied percentage in literature. The incidence of torsion and rupture of cyst in pregnancy has been estimated to be around 5% and less than 1%, respectively (1). This risk of torsion has been estimated to be as high as 20% when the cyst is larger than 6 cm (6),(9),(10). This rises the need for an emergency surgical intervention during the antenatal period. In the present study only 5/37- 14% patients needed an emergency surgery for torsion. Similar incidence of torsion was seen in another large study which quoted that 12%-18% of patients with ovarian torsion were pregnant (11). Another study in 2020 confirmed that although torsion ovary is a known complication for adnexal masses in pregnancy it more frequently occurs in the first trimester as compared to later gestation ages (12). USG features of adnexal masses has been proven to be accurate and considered to be a safe imaging modality in pregnancy (13). It is easily available, non invasive and is part of the routine antenatal care (14). The characteristic USG feature of dermoid cyst is the presence of ‘Rokitansky nodule’ - a hyperechoic nodule with acoustic shadowing in a background of low-level echoes. This is the ‘tip of the iceberg phenomenon’ which is an echogenic cyst with posterior attenuation of sound caused by sebum and hair contents. ‘Dermoid mesh pattern’ which is seen as multiple interdigitating lines and dots occur when hair is floating in sebum. as shown in (Table/Fig 4) (15). Presence of 2 /3 features on USG was shown to have a 100% positive predictive value (4). The contents of the cyst are predominantly- sebaceous material with hair and rarely - bone, teeth, thyroid cartilage, etc. While assessing an adnexal cyst in pregnancy the Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) simple rules form an acceptable guidance to decide on the benign nature of the cyst (16),(17). When USG is inconclusive or for evaluation of large masses for adjacent organ invasion- MRI is the higher imaging to be done (1). In the present study population USG was the imaging modality that was used for diagnosis and follow-up. This test being easily accessible, economical and non invasive yet accurate, and can be part of the routine evaluation done during pregnancy as part of the foetal morphology and growth scans. The role of tumor markers in evaluation of adnexal masses in pregnancy is challenging as they can be normally raised due to pregnancy and therefore lack specificity (1),(18). Their levels can fluctuate with gestational age and are also elevated due to abnormal placentation or foetal abnormalities (19). Hence, tumor markers need to be done only when the cyst looks suspicious of malignancy. In the present study one patient had suspicious looking features on USG needing MRI and tumor markers for further evaluation. However, all the other patients did not require a higher imaging modality for characterising the cyst. The management depends mainly on symptomatology and radiological features. They can be offered conservative management with serial USG provided they remain asymptomatic and there is no increase in size of the cyst (1),(20),(21). Although the risk of torsion in adnexal masses in pregnancy is estimated to be as high as 20% for cysts larger than 6 cm, studies has shown that it is not justified to perform an elective surgery in larger cysts in the absence of suggestive symptoms and complications [10,22]. Complimenting this thought is also the proven evidence in literature that the chance of torsion in pregnancy decreases as the gestation advances with a maximum occurrence in the first trimester (12). The role of conservative management was evident in the present study- 70% of the patients were managed conservatively with no adverse outcome. Thereby, avoiding surgical intervention antenatally and its associated co-morbidities. The cyst can be operated concomitantly at delivery among patients undergoing LSCS for obstetric indications. In the present study, 13/26 -50% patients were managed in this manner. Of these patients two had bilateral dermoid cyst and underwent bilateral cystectomy during LSCS. Contrary to this literature states that bilateral dermoid cyst is an indication for surgery during the antenatal period especially for cyst of size >6 cm (23).

Among those needing emergency surgery (11/37-30%) the most common indication was torsion ovary (5/11-46%). None of them had rupture or haemorrhage in cyst which is similar to the incidence stated in literature - torsion being the most common as compared to the others (1). According to recent literature, laparoscopy, if surgical intervention is indicated, is proven to be a safe option for surgical approach during pregnancy (1),(18). Laparoscopy is preferred over laparotomy in pregnancy as a safer alternative (24). It can be performed as an emergency or elective procedure provided the needed precautionary methods are followed. In the present study 10/11- (91%) patients underwent laparoscopic surgery for the cyst antenatally. The outcome of pregnancy was favorable in all of them except two patients who aborted postoperatively.

Safety measures to be considered while planning a laparoscopic surgery antenatally are: availability of surgical expertise, open technique for primary port placement in the supraumbilical region, maintaining low and stable CO2 insufflation pressure (below 12 mmHg), slow inclination to Trendelenburg position, use of left lateral tilt in pregnancies that are beyond 20 weeks of gestation and careful monitoring of mother and foetus during the procedure (25). However, beyond 28 weeks of gestation there is an increased risk of preterm labor (1). however there is now growing evidence to prove the safety of laparoscopy in any trimester (26),(27).

Limitation(s)

The retrospective design of the study itself was a limitation. A prospective study to assess the fears experienced by patients as they go through pregnancy with a dermoid cyst would also be helpful in counselling such patients in the future.

Conclusion

The study supports the role of conservative management with serial USG for benign-looking dermoid cysts diagnosed during pregnancy, following the IOTA rules. The intention was to offer planned surgical intervention either at the time of LSCS done for obstetric indications or at a later date after delivery. Laparoscopy can be safely performed during pregnancy while adhering to certain precautionary measures. In cases where there is suspicion of malignancy or when complications such as necrosis, rupture, or haemorrhage occur, laparotomy should be considered regardless of the gestational age.

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to acknowledge the medical records staff who helped in retrieving the data, as well as, all the doctors, sonologists, and clerical staff who contributed to the care of the patients and the collection of the present data.

References

1.
Martone S, Troìa L, Luisi S. Adnexal masses during pregnancy: Management for a better approach. Gynecol Surg. 2021;18:3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10397-021-01084-9. [crossref]
2.
Njoku C, Oriji PC, Afolabi AS, Kuete E. Bilateral dermoid cyst of the ovary: A case report. Yen Med J. 2020;2(1):190-92.
3.
St. Louis M, Mangal R, Stead TS, Sosa M, Ganti L. Ovarian dermoid tumour. Cureus. 2022;14(7):e27233. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.27233. [crossref]
4.
de Haan J, Verheecke M, Amant F. Management of ovarian cysts and cancer in pregnancy. Facts Views Vis ObGyn. 2015;7:25-31.
5.
Hakoun AM, AbouAl-Shaar I, Zaza KJ, Abou-Al-Shaar H, ASalloum MN. Adnexal masses in pregnancy: An updated review. Avicenna J Med. 2017;7:153-57. https://doi.org/10.4103/ajm.AJM_22_17. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Rottenstreich M, Rotem R, Hirsch A, Moran I, Ben-Shushan A, Armon S, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes following laparoscopy for suspected adnexal torsion during pregnancy: A multicenter cohort study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020;302:1413-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05752-7. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Caspi B, Levi R, Appelman Z, Rabinerson D, Goldman G, Hagay Z. Conservative management of ovarian cystic teratoma during pregnancy and labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182:503-5. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2000.103768. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Osto M, Brooks A, Khan A. Ovarian cystic teratoma in pregnant women: Conservative management or prophylactic oophorectomy? Cureus. 2021;13(8):e17354. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.17354. [crossref]
9.
Schmeler KM, Mayo-Smith WW, Peipert JF, Weitzen S, Manuel MD, Gordinier ME. Adnexal masses in pregnancy: Surgery compared with observation. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:1098. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000157465.99639.e5. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Koo YJ, Kim TJ, Lee JE, Kwon YS, Kim HJ, Lee IH, et al. Risk of torsion and malignancy by adnexal mass size in pregnant women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2011;90:358-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01070.x. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Houry D, Abbott JT. Ovarian torsion: A fifteen-year review. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2001;38(2):156-59. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S019606440188971X. (Accessed June 12, 2023). [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Feng JL, Zheng J, Lei T, Xu YJ, Pang H, Xie HN. Comparison of ovarian torsion between pregnant and non-pregnant women at reproductive ages: Sonographic and pathological findings. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2020;10:137-47. https://doi.org/10.21037/qims.2019.11.06. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Nick AM, Schmeler K. Adnexal masses in pregnancy. Perinatology. 2010;1(2):13-19. Available from: https://www.perinatology.com/perinatology/Volume1-Issue2/Adnexal%20Masses%20in%20Pregnancy.htm. (Accessed October 6, 2022).
14.
Sarbhai MYV. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography with laparoscopy for assessment of benign adnexal masses. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2020;9:283-88. [crossref]
15.
Sahin H, Abdullazade S, Sanci M. Mature cystic teratoma of the ovary: A cutting edge overview on imaging features. Insights Imaging. 2017;8:227-41. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Auekitrungrueng R, Tinnangwattana D, Tantipalakorn C, Charoenratana C, Lerthiranwong T, Wanapirak C, et al. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis simple rules and the risk of malignancy index to discriminate between benign and malignant adnexal masses. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019;146(3):364-69. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Timmerman D, Ameye L, Fischerova D, Epstein E, Melis GB, Guerriero S, et al. Simple ultrasound rules to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal masses before surgery: Prospective validation by IOTA group. BMJ. 2010;341:c6839. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c6839. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Cavaco-Gomes J, Jorge Moreira C, Rocha A, Mota R, Paiva V, Costa A. Investigation and management of adnexal masses in pregnancy. Scientifica. 2016;2016:3012802. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3012802. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Sarandakou A, Protonotariou E, Rizos D. Tumour markers in biological fluids associated with pregnancy. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2007;44:151-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408360601003143. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Hoo WL, Yazbek J, Holland T, Mavrelos D, Tong ENC, Jurkovic D. Expectant management of ultrasonically diagnosed ovarian dermoid cysts: Is it possible to predict outcome? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;36:235-40. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.7610. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Rao DT. TOG article: Management of adnexal masses in pregnancy. Dr Tanushree Rao Women Health Blog 2017. https://medgyne.com/tog-article-management-of-adnexal-masses-in-pregnancy/. (Accessed September 30, 2023).
22.
Mukhopadhyay A, Shinde A, Naik R. Ovarian cysts and cancer in pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;33:58-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2015.10.015. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Moradan S. Surgical management of an ovarian bilateral multiple dermoid cyst during pregnancy: A case report study. Middle East J Rehabil Health Stud. 2016;3(2):e36097. https://doi.org/10.17795/mejrh-36097. [crossref]
24.
Ribic-Pucelj M, Kobal B, Peternelj-Marinsek S. Surgical treatment of adnexal masses in pregnancy: Indications, surgical approach and pregnancy outcome. J Reprod Med. 2007;52:273-79.
25.
Dizon AM, Carey ET. Minimally invasive gynecologic surgery in the pregnant patient: considerations, techniques, and postoperative management per trimester. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2018;30(4):267-71.[crossref][PubMed]
26.
Minig L, Otaño L, Cruz P, Patrono MG, Botazzi C, Zapardiel I. Laparoscopic surgery for treating adnexal masses during the first trimester of pregnancy. J Minimal Access Surg. 2016;12:22-25. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.171960. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Weiner E, Mizrachi Y, Keidar R, Kerner R, Golan A, Sagiv R. Laparoscopic surgery performed in advanced pregnancy compared to early pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;292(5):1063-8.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/63746.18535

Date of Submission: Feb 24, 2023
Date of Peer Review: May 22, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Jul 11, 2023
Date of Publishing: Oct 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? NA
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Mar 02, 2023
• Manual Googling: Jun 10, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Jul 08, 2023 (6%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com